Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta UAV. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta UAV. Mostrar todas las entradas

lunes, 20 de noviembre de 2017

Downing down NK missiles: The need of a new approach


Concerned that the missile defense system designed to protect American cities is insufficient by itself to deter a North Korean attack, the Trump administration is expanding its strategy to also try to stop Pyongyang’s missiles before they get far from Korean airspace.

Congressional documents are actually talking about “additional investments” in “boost-phase missile defense.” The goal is to hit long-range missiles at their point of greatest vulnerability: while their engines are firing and the vehicles are stressed to the breaking point, and before their warheads are deployed.

In interviews, defense officials, along with top scientists and senior members of Congress, describe the effort as a response to the unexpected progress that North Korea has made in developing ICBMs capable of delivering a nuclear bomb to the continental United States: “It is an all-out effort,” said Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, who returned from a lengthy visit to South Korea last month, convinced that the United States needed to do far more to counter North Korea. “There is a fast-emerging threat, a diminishing window, and a recognition that we can’t be reliant on one solution.”

One first approach is to have stealth fighters such as the F-22 or the F-35 scramble from nearby bases in South Korea and Japan at the first sign of North Korean launch preparations. The jets would carry conventional air-to-air missiles, which are 12 feet long, and fire them at the North Korean long-range missiles after they are launched. But they would have to fly relatively close to North Korea to do that, increasing the chances of being shot down.

A second approach -hinted at in an emergency request to Congress last week for $4 billion to deal with North Korea- envisions the stepped-up use of cyber weapons to interfere with the North’s control systems before missiles are launched. Using cyber weapons to disrupt launches is a radical innovation in missile defense in the past three decades, but in the case of North Korea it is also the most difficult: It requires getting into the missile manufacturing, launch control and guidance systems of a country that makes very limited use of the internet and has few connections to the outside world — most of them through China, and to a lesser degree Russia.

And a third approach is to develop a UAV that would fire potent laser beams at rising missiles. But recent plans would have it make its debut no sooner than 2025 — too late to play a role in the current crisis or the Trump presidency.

martes, 4 de julio de 2017

Industry 4.0 and the risk of nuclear proliferation


Because 3D printers can produce a wide variety of three-dimensional objects, the potential commercial and industrial applications are generating the arrival of a new manufacturing revolution, known as Industry 4.0.

Industry 4.0 is spreading in all the fields of manufacturing industry, and it also includes (¿why not?) defense industry. Some examples:
  • The U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is already experimenting with 3D printing in the manufacture of rocket engines.  (Dfr.: Kimberly Newton, “NASA Engineers Test Combustion Chamber to Advance 3-D Printed Rocket Engine Design,” NASA.gov, December 8, 2016)
  • The U.S. and British Navies have been using 3D printers on aircraft carriers at sea to produce customized UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) during deployments. (Cfr.: Kyle Mizokami, “The future of America’s aircraft carriers?  Floating drone factories,” The Week, April 21, 2016; Jon Rosamond, “U.S., U.K. Navies Expanding Experiments Using 3D Printing,’ USNI News, September 22, 2015.)
But not all about 3D printing is pink-coloured, as it presents certain risks that must be taken into account. In this regard, Matthew Kroenig and Tristan Volpe assessed the risk of nuclear proliferation in their article titled “3D printing the bomb?” (Cfr.: The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 3, Fall 2015, pp. 7-19) and the topic is garnering attention among policy analysts.

Much of the concern surrounds whether 3D printing represents a new way for a state-level WMD program to circumvent nonproliferation export controls, thanks to use a convenient way to produce sensitive components: The law uses to run behind the life, and today we have to face the risk of following guidelines developed by the Nuclear Suppliers Group and Missile Technology Control Regime in an era when 3D Printing didn't exist... but to be applied followed in a new era where anybody can send electronically some different CAD files corresponding to different parts of a sensitive assembly, to be printed in different 3D printing service bureaus located in different countries. ¿Impossible? Not at all: If you can imagine it, it can happen. And if the Nuclear Suppliers Group and the Missile Technology Control Regime do not update their guidelines to the new challenges represented by the Industry 4.0, the hidden production and sale of sensitive WMD-relevant dual-use goods is not entirely hypothetical.

lunes, 26 de junio de 2017

MDA seeks laser-armed HALE UAV for counter-ICBM role


The United States is looking to field a laser-armed UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle) to intercept ICBMs (Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles) towards the middle of the next decade, the MDA (Missile Defense Agency) disclosed on 13 June.

sábado, 15 de abril de 2017

S-400 en Siria: ¿Ficción o realidad?


Más allá de consideraciones políticas, vamos a abordar hoy la dimensión militar del reciente ataque con misiles llevado a cabo por el ejército de los Estados Unidos contra una base aérea controlada por el gobierno de Siria.


En teoría
Sobre el papel, el sistema S-400 está diseñado para destruir aviones, UAVs y misiles balísticos o de crucero en un radio de hasta 400 kilómetros de distancia; también se afirma que está equipado con un radar capaz de detectar objetivos a una distancia de 600 km; ya sea ficción o realidad, lo cierto es que desde su instalación en el territorio sirio, la acción de aviones de combate occidentales y turcos en apoyo de las fuerzas rebeldes ha sido limitada.


A favor
Llama la atención que el comando militar de Estados Unidos decidiera atacar desde una distancia segura utilizando para ello misiles Tomahawk en lugar de aviones de combate. Para los expertos, ello podría significar que el Pentágono reconoce implícitamente la eficacia del sistema S-400 contra sus aviones de combate y su limitada o incluso nula vulnerabilidad a la capacidad de interferencia electrónica de los aviones americanos EA-18G Growler.


En contra
El aluvión de misiles Tomahawk ha demostrado la capacidad del ejército americano para atravesar las defensas rusas en Siria, mostrando una posible vulnerabilidad del S-400 ante un ataque de misiles crucero volando a baja altitud y con una reducida huella de radar. Ante esta realidad, se plantean cuatro posibilidades:

1ª) El S-400 detectó el enjambre de Tomahawks, pero fue técnicamente incapaz de neutralizarlos a todos.

2º) El S-400 detectó el enjambre de Tomahawks, pero el comando militar ruso optó deliberadamente por no derribar los misiles.

3º) El S-400 detectó el enjambre de Tomahawks, pero el personal a cargo del sistema y/o la cadena de mando fueron incapaces de reaccionar a tiempo.

4º) No había ningún sistema S-400.

lunes, 29 de julio de 2013

Pakistan protesta por el ataque de los Estados Unidos en Waziristan



Pakistan ha condenado con dureza el ataque llevado a cabo hace unas horas en Waziristan, que ha terminado con la vida de siete personas. Todos los indicios apuntan a que el ataque se ha llevado a cabo mediante un misil AGM-114 "Hellfire" disparado desde un UAV General Atomics MQ-9 "Reaper" .